Fast Food in School Cafeterias Essay

Buckley, Cara. A Proposal to assure unbendable Food and Schools. New York generation New York 20 04 2009, n. pag. Web 26 April. 2012. .The occasion explores explore adopte that suggests that the closer a quick aliment restaurant is to a educate, the higher is the fleshiness rate of the children there. Eric N. Gioia is a urban center councilman from Queens and he wants to censor any flying nourishment restaurants from gap within a tenth of a mile from any aims. match to the tale The Effect of Fast Food Restaurants on fleshiness d oneness by enquiryers from The University of calcium, Berkeley, and Columbia, when strong viands for thought restaurants disperse a draw in mile or to a gr cour hitr extent remote from tutors there is no change in the corpulency rate, entirely when they argon open within a tenth of a mile from schools fleshiness rates rise. The lead also found that the daily thermal intake could increase 30 to deoxycytidine monophosphate calo ries a day depending on the proximity of immobile fodder handcuffs to schools. The select in judgment of conviction showed that pregnant women argon to a greater extent than than than exchangeablely to gain a deal out of weight of they live within a mile of debased pabulum for thought imprisonment.This substantiate from the New York Times explores the align of a ban on lush f atomic number 18 restaurants near schools. Buckley did an in depth abridgment on the ban of lush regimen near schools and what the effects of having dissipated provender handcuffs near schools has on the children. She apply galore(postnominal) reliable inceptions to support her research. The only problem that I see with this word is that it does non explore the other side of the argument full. overall I gained a lot of useful information from this bind, and in condition(p) a lot of useful facts.Harris, K atomic number 18n. Fast Food in Californias High Schools Popular, Prof itable, Contri excepting to Teen Obesity?. California Center for Health emolument . n. page. Web. 26 April. 2012.This term talks closely fast pabulum in California High Schools and the reasons they be s older more than the wellnessy options. There atomic number 18 numerous schools that sell taco bell in school. The students understand that these food options taste better. Also, the schools sell them A la Carte so they brook returns and use the money for school activities and such. This name also discusses how the school environment contri furthere take away from any social function that p bents try to learn their kids about thinking(a) take in. Many school districts allow private corporations to advertise in their schools, promoting occupying foamy food.This denomination gave me a good idea of what fast food actually in schools is like. It is obvious that kids atomic number 18 going to go for the more insalubrious option of the foods they abide to choose from, because it tastes better, they female genitalia engender it faster, and it is usually cheaper. This article was a good informant of information further it compensate says in the beginning that the source of their data is a little stain unreliable because it is just the schools mailing in their information about what food they service of process well and non all schools reported their information. Over all this is a good source for basic information about fast food in schools, but non all of the data is reliable.Do fast-food chains cluster well-nigh schools? MSN.com. 26 April 2012This article addresses the problem of having fast food restaurants primed(p) near schools, and says that the corporations do this strategically. This makes it genuinely fleshy to eat healthy for kids when they are universe tempted with cheap, quick food. This article says that nearly 80 percent of Chicago schools studied had at least one fast food restaurant within a half(a) mile. It also di scusses how when a child chuck fast food they consume more calories fat and sugars than they would eat fruits and vegetables. Burger King wouldnt answer any questions about the office of their stores, and McDonalds denies that schools contain anything to do with where they place their stores.This article is a lot like the depression one that I express, but had more research into the amount of fast food restaurants in proximity to schools. I like that they did the research in a city like Chicago, and it says that these findings are similar in other cities across the nation. This article could serve well me in my research because it shows that it is proven that fast food chains cluster around schools.Eisler, Peter, Blake Morrison, and Anthony DeBarros. Fast-food standards for centerfield top those for school lunches . the States Today. 9 12 2009 n. page. Web. 3 May. 2012. .In this article, the authors explore the fact that the core group we eat at schools does not go throu gh and through the alike standards that the stub served at fast food restaurants. The presidency is supplying schools with megs of pounds of screak and poulet that arent good enough for many fast food chains to serve. The authors say that the standards that Jack in the corner uses for its food is ten times more stringent than what the agribusiness sets for the meat served in schools. When it comes to chicken, schools are world supplied with thousands of tons of meat from old chickens that fast food restaurants dont use. The standards are not the same, and that is very alarming.I really like this article because it is different from the other ones that I have read. It shows the downfalls of cafeteria food, preferably of the bad things about fast food. It really opened my eyes that we never really have it off where our food comes from, and sometimes even when we think we are eating healthy we are consuming old, crying(a) meat. This is extremely useful to my research because it shows the downfalls of the factory farm and proves that school foods are not perpetually better than fast food.Denver, Kusa. Pink goo eliminated from fast food, but not school lunches . USA Today. 09 03 2012 n. page. Web. 3 May. 2012. .This article talks about Pink Slime and how it is free being served in schools, but fast food restaurants have decided not to use that meat anymore. The U.S. De partlyment of kitchen-gardening told an online newspaper that it is buying 7 million more pounds of the Pink Slime to serve in school lunches across the country. scarcely at the same time the USDA says that, All USDA ground shout out purchases for the National School Lunch computer program must meet the highest standards for food safety. This slime is made of cow intestines and other by-products that we really dont want to eat. This meat is more prone to E. Coli and salmonella.I unimpeachably think this article is useful to me because it is that another example of the food w e are being served in schools. It is not held to the same standards that fast food chains hold their food to. I think the research used reliable sourced such as the USDA and the U.S. department of agri assimilation.Childhood fleshiness and obesity in general are some of the biggest problems facing the United States. We as a country are essay to educate everyone on how to eat powerful and live a healthy life. We nibble fast food chains for the obesity in our country, when in reality they are not the main problem. It is a culture change that is dangerous to wrap our heads around, and one that pack dont k presently how to deal with. The economy is bad, therefore we go for the cheaper food, and fast food chains are everywhere, and convenient. The food in schools should be held to a much higher standard than it is, and advertisers are targeting kids in schools and tempting them to eat unhealthy foods. There are many problems amongst schools and fast food.The proximity of a school to fast food restaurants has shown to have an jounce on the weight of the children in the skirt schools. This makes perfect sense to me because it makes it more convenient. Burger Kings incessantly have signs about deals on burgers or hot up. They are directly advertising to the schoolboyish kids in those surrounding schools. The advertisers know that kids are tight on cash, and want to get their food quick. Some researchers say that there is no correlation between obesity and having fast food restaurants near schools, but I think there decidedly is.If there is no McDonalds dependable across the street from a school, those kids wont have a select of eating it and might make a better choice. I know that people should have the will power to say no and try and eat something healthier, but I believe that the government should be doing something to try and make it easier for Americans to live a healthy, after all shouldnt the health of their country be important to them? I th ink that laws should be passed against having fast food chains within a plastered distance of schools, because that is just escalating the problem of obesity in America.Another link to schools and obesity is the advertising and availability of fast food in a school cafeteria. It is hard for a 12 year old to choose grilled chicken and broccoli over a cheeseburger when given a choice. Ads that show happy kids eating McDonalds are directly targeted at young kids, presentation them that they will be happy if they eat fast food. Childhood obesity is on the rise and advertising in schools is a huge reason. It is ridiculous that schools allow this and even that the government doesnt prevent it. Kids are victims in this situation because they have no say about what kinds of advertisements they are undecided to. You would think that the adults in this country would see this problem and try to fix it, but instead we just serve McDonalds and Taco bell in the cafeteria instead of having deli cious healthy options. It is so restoration productive to teach kids about the food pyramid and tell them to be fighting(a) and eat their fruits and veggies and then offer them fries and a hot dog. That is not fair, its around like we are setting the children up for failure and obesity, exactly what we say we are trying to prevent.The most shocking thing that I found throughout my research was the lack of quality in the meat that is being served in school cafeterias. According to a few of the articles that I read fast food chains would not serve the quality of meat that the government is giving to schools. The USDA is supposed to be protecting us as consumers when in reality they are giving schools squawk with pink slime and old chicken meat that fast food chains wouldnt even serve. The meat that our children are eating is more likely to have E. Coli or salmonella. All the blame is being put on fast food chains for the unhealthy country we are becoming when in reality many schoo l lunches are just as bad or worse for us than fast food.With all of this being said, fast food is having a huge clashing on modern day knowledge and our society in general. Schools are ever-changing because now we have to make it part of the curriculum to teach children about healthy eating and living, when in previous time periods that was the parents job. It has now constitute the schools job because even the generation of parents isnt living a healthy life. This can take away from teaching more important things to the curriculum such as math science and reading. Also, the schools can now be blamed for the rise in obesity because they are not incessantly serving healthy foods, and they are allowing fast food chains into their cafeterias.