A World Without Morality By Sezlyn Petersen Essay - 982 Words

A World without Morality by Sezlyn Petersen In this paper, I will discuss Error Theory Nihilism and it’s relation to Moral Abolitionism. According to Richard T. Garner, the world would be a better place if we abolished morality by eradicating all objective moral truths. This means that the morals and values I’ve heard all throughout my life would become non-existent, and suggests that people should live their life without identifying things as right and wrong. However, this way of thinking is not necessarily a practical way to envision the world. A world without morality goes against hundreds of years of fundamental concepts that are carved into society, and it is a difficult one to imagine. My purpose is to explore whether or not morality should exist through the disastrous results argument, and if we should refute arguments viewed as â€Å"unjust or immoral† by saying it’s just wrong. Error Theory Nihilism fuels the concept that there are no objecti ve moral truths. There are three types of Error Theory Nihilism: Abolitionism, Fictionalism, and Exceptionalism. Moral Abolitionism claims that people ought to abolish morality, Fictionalism states that there is no morality, but there are consequences if people were to get rid of it. Lastly, Exceptionalism is the perfect balance between the two. The implications of accepting Nihilism are that you are only able to accept the facts, thus you will approach solving problems better. The error comes into play, based on the fact